Join us for an in-depth discussion on the recent Supreme Court decision in Garland v. Cargill with expert, Professor Joseph Blocher from Duke Law School, co-director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law.

In this explainer, Professor Blocher breaks down the recent Supreme Court decision, Garland v. Cargill, which overturned the ban on "Bump Stocks" on guns. According to Professor Blocher, this case surprisingly hinges on the definition of "Machine gun" under federal law and how exactly a trigger is struck when using a bump stock.

► [ Ссылка ] for more legal explainers and interviews with the titans of law.

Key topics covered:

Background and significance of the Garland v. Cargill case
Explanation of what bump stocks are and their functionality
Details of the Supreme Court's decision in Garland v. Cargill and the arguments presented
Distinctions between semi-automatic weapons with a bump stock and automatic weapons
The impact of this ruling on future gun regulations and statutory interpretations
____________________

Chapters:
0:00 - Overview
1:30 - Background of the Garland v. Cargill Case
4:50 - What is a Bump Stock?
8:20 - Supreme Court's Decision Explained
10:15 - Implications for Future Gun Regulations


#SupremeCourt #BumpStocks #GunLaw #GarlandvCargill #LegalAnalysis #DukeLaw #JosephBlocher #TalksOnLaw #FirearmsLaw

Transcript Excerpt:

Hello and welcome to Talks on Law. I'm Joel Cohen. Today we're talking about a recent Supreme Court decision that just came down, overturning the ban on bump stocks. We have a Second Amendment scholar and a Talks on Law favorite with us, Professor Joseph Blocher, who teaches at Duke Law School and is the co-director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law. Joseph, welcome back to Talks on Law...

Watch the full interview for a detailed exploration of this significant case and its broader legal context.

свернуть