The meltdown at a nuclear power station in Fukushima, Japan, ten years ago stoked anxieties about nuclear energy. But nuclear is one of the safest, most reliable and sustainable forms of energy, and decarbonising will be much more difficult without it.
Further content:
Sign up to our newsletter about climate change: [ Ссылка ]
The Economist also has a new weekly newsletter, Simply Science: [ Ссылка ]
Find all our coverage on science and technology: [ Ссылка ]
See our latest coverage on climate change: [ Ссылка ]
Why didn't the Fukushima disaster spur reforms in Japan? [ Ссылка ]
The lessons about nuclear power, ten years on from Fukushima: [ Ссылка ]
What is the future of Britain’s nuclear reactors? [ Ссылка ]
Why smaller nuclear reactors might be better: [ Ссылка ]
How the world relies on Russia for nuclear power plants: [ Ссылка ]
Listen to an episode of The Intelligence podcast about nuclear arms control: [ Ссылка ]
Will nuclear energy power war zones? [ Ссылка ]
Could floating reactors be a better option? [ Ссылка ]
The most promising zero-carbon resources: [ Ссылка ]
Nuclear power: why is it so unpopular?
Теги
The EconomistEconomistEconomist FilmsEconomist VideosPoliticsNewsshort-documentarynuclear powermyth busting nuclear powermythbustingmythmythbustersmythbusternuclear energynuclear power plantnuclearnuclear power debatefukushimaatomhow does nuclear power worknuclear power environmental impactdocumentaryfukushima nuclear disasterradiationchernobylchernobyl disasterchernobyl nuclear power plantnuclear disaster