What makes a historical reproduction good? Is it authentic representation or high quality? Both? What if perfection actually contradicts historical accuracy?
Nowadays sword collectors and reviewers have certain expectations and quality standards... flawless finish, tight fit, and machine-like symmetry are usually among them. Those are things that craftsmen in medieval Europe did not necessarily care so much about, as evidenced by originals you can see in museums. They may be uneven, have asymmetrical fullers or central ridges, loose guards, inconsistent distal tapers, etc.
Perhaps (and I'm just speculating here) this is part of why the katana came to be seen as superior to European swords, considering how much emphasis Japanese culture put(s) on diligently going the extra mile?
So in order to be accurate, should modern reproductions be deliberately flawed? Personally I don't think so. Let's discuss the topic of "perfection" in historical weapons.
The video I'm responding to:
"Medieval swords were (usually) awful - A response to Matt Easton" by Tod's Workshop
[ Ссылка ]
*** Music credits ***
Outro:
"Highland Storm" by The Slanted Room Records
[ Ссылка ]
Used with artist's permission
*** Merch ***
[ Ссылка ]
If you want to join Bonfire to start selling your own merch: [ Ссылка ]
*** Support the channel ***
Help fund future videos, get bonus content and access to an exclusive Discord server:
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
Other ways to support the channel by shopping through affiliate links:
Kult of Athena, my favorite online store for reproductions of historical arms and armor, fantasy swords, etc:
[ Ссылка ]
Where to get HEMA gear and practice swords:
[ Ссылка ]
Want to treat your face fluff? I highly recommend the balms and oils from Beard Sorcery:
[ Ссылка ]
Books about history, martial arts, swords, knives, video/audio equipment, and other stuff I recommend:
US - [ Ссылка ]
Canada - [ Ссылка ]
*** Social media ***
[ Ссылка ]_
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
#skallagrim #swords #history
