We all know full frame is better than crop sensors in low light, but what about good light? Is there still advantages to full frame vs micro four thirds and aps-c in good lighting? M4/3 has some advantages over bigger heavier full frame setups. Let's do some comparisons Olympus em1 III with 75-300mm vs Sony A7S III with 100-400mm GM and Fuji XT4 with 70-300mm for wildlife. Don't have the new OM1 or Panasonic GH6 to test yet.
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, your camera will be so light that when a hawk grabs it off your shoulder strap and flies away with it, you'll be slightly less devastated due to the lower cost.
Panasonic GH6 [ Ссылка ]
Olympus OM-1 [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ]
Olympus EM1 III [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ]
Olympus 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ]
Sony A7S III [ Ссылка ]
Sony 100-400mm GM f4.5-5.6 [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ]
Sony 2x Teleconverter [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ]
Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ] or used! [ Ссылка ]
Fuji XT4 [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ]
Fuji 70-300mm [ Ссылка ]
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! [ Ссылка ]
Patreon for Monthly Q&A Videos [ Ссылка ]
T-shirts and merch! [ Ссылка ]
My Monkey Strength ebook [ Ссылка ]
My Music from videos! Entire Discography 15% off [ Ссылка ]
Random ass donations to paypal.me/vegetablepolice Thank you!
Q-Link Products changed my life! [ Ссылка ]
My Health Channel Vegetable Police [ Ссылка ]
My Music Channel Stern Beats [ Ссылка ]
