The goal of Friendship is to relinquish enmity, or is able to but does not do so, or neither desires nor do so, or both desires to and does so.
If friendship desires but cannot do so, then Friendship is pathetic, and this (supposedly) does not apply to Friendship.
If friendship is able to do but does not desire to relinquish enmity, then friendship is spiteful – which is equally foreign to Friendship's nature.
If friendship has no desire nor ability to relinquish enmity, it is both pathetic and spiteful, and therefore not Friendship.
If Friendship desires and is able to do so, which is the only thing fitting for Friendship, where then do friendship problems come from? Or why does Friendship not relinquish such things?

It cannot be understated just how inherently conservacucked the notion of friendship is. After all, if friendship is real, then why do bad things happen to good friends? Can a friendless person be a friendly person? Not to mention that people have historically done bad things in the name of friendship: Gentle reminder that the Holocaust began because a bunch of cartoonishly genocidal maniacs were FRIENDS with each other. Yes, I am in fact saying that friendship caused the deaths of 6 million Jews, Jews who could have continued living if not for the fact that Nazi Germans who made friends with other like-minded racists destroyed them all.

It should be a crime for people to watch a little girl’s show that promotes something as anti-Semitic as “friendship”. The quicker we do away with this friend-shit nonsense, the better off everyone will be.
---
This video features materials protected by the Fair Use guidelines of Section 107 of The Copyright Act of 1976 (a U.S. copyright act). All rights reserved to the original copyright owners.

свернуть