An overview of the Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, published in 1993. (ISBN 9780840783912, 0840783914). Printed in two text columns in a verse-by-verse format, this volume features a 9.5 point, somewhat dark font. The words of Christ are in red. The paper is heavier and more opaque than that in the complete Orthodox Study Bible (OSB), published in 2008.

This review contrasts the OSB New Testament and Psalms with the complete OSB. My review of the complete OSB may be viewed here: [ Ссылка ] .

A footnote in the OSB New Testament and Psalms at Revelation 20.2 states that the Second Ecumenical Council rejected premillennialism. From 22:47 until 38:46, the video discusses the historical accuracy of that footnote. If you are interested in the OSB New Testament and Psalms but not in that specific question, you may wish to skip forward from 22:47 to 38:46. If, however, you have no interest in this particular Bible but are intrigued by that historical question, please begin viewing at the 22:47 point.

Erratum: At the 23:40 point, I mentioned a chart that compares the original Nicene Creed of 325 A.D. to the creed approved in 381, but I failed to overlay that chart onto the video. The chart's purpose was simply to show that the words 'whose kingdom shall have no end' were added between 325 and 381. For those interested, I will post that chart to the channel's Community page.

Detailed Contents

00:00 Dimensions, margins, layout, font (four charts)
01:04 Size compared to the Eastern Orthodox Bible (EOB) New Testament
01:19 Size compared to the complete Orthodox Study Bible
02:05 Page layout
03:32 The font in the text
06:00 The page-bottom notes
06:12 Paper qualities
07:23 Print non-uniformity (fading)
07:40 Book introductions
09:50 The Psalms
10:08 Morning and Evening Prayers
11:29 The index of annotations
12:39 The concordance
13:10 The index to the maps and the color maps
13:45 The blue and yellow tail band
13:47 This glued hardback lies flat in Matthew
14:34 The copyright page
15:00 The list of articles
15:30 A close-up look at the font
16:07 A translation continuum chart
16:32 The NKJV New Testament is based on the Textus Receptus, and so generally follows Byzantine readings
17:26 Some locations where the NKJV New Testament disagrees with the Patriarchal Text of 1904/12
17:54 The font compared to that in the complete Orthodox Study Bible
18:32 The font compared to that in the Eastern Orthodox Bible New Testament
19:03 Are the footnotes in the OSB New Testament and Psalms different from those in the complete OSB?
21:20 The articles were reformatted, but the contents are similar
22:47 An extended discussion on the question of whether the Second Ecumenical Council condemned premillennialism (chiliasm) through the words, “Whose kingdom shall have no end.”
24:13 St. Athanasius, On the Synods – the statement of the Eusebians about Marcellus of Ancyra
26:56 St. Cyril of Jerusalem on Marcellus of Ancyra, who believed Christ’s kingdom would have an end
29:10 The editors of the Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers set claim that ‘whose kingdom shall have no end’ was directed against the heresy of Marcellus of Ancyra
30:22 Some premillennialists say his kingdom shall have no end – Blaising and Bock on Progressive Dispensationalism
32:27 I am not defending chiliasm; I am questioning the accuracy of the footnote at Revelation 20.2
33:06 Did the Second Ecumenical Council anathematize chiliasm (premillennialism) when it condemned the heresy of Apollinarius of Laodicea?
34:03 St. Basil the Great on the chiliastic views of Apollinarius of Laodicea
34:45 Canon I of the Second Ecumenical Council, and the condemnation of heresies. All of the other heretics named were proponents of heretical theologies or Christologies, not eschatologies
35:40 The capitula of the Second Council of Constantinople (553) on the heresy of Apollinarius
36:19 St. Gregory Nazianzen on the heresy of Apollinarius
38:14 If anyone has historical evidence that chiliasm was condemned at the Second Ecumenical Council, I would like to hear it
38:46 Summary
41:27 A chart comparing the 1993 OSB New Testament and Psalms to the 2008 OSB
43:46 The Index to the Annotations in the 2008 OSB appears to be much more thorough than that in the 1993 OSB New Testament and Psalms

свернуть