The case is about a phone answering service provider, Lauria, who knew that some of his customers were prostitutes. Lauria and three prostitutes were accused of being part of a prostitution conspiracy. Lauria admitted to knowing about his customers' illegal activities. The trial court dismissed the indictment due to lack of probable cause. The prosecution appealed arguing that Lauria became part of the criminal conspiracy through his knowledge of the illegal activities. The most relevant facts are Lauria's knowledge of the illegal activities and his role as a service provider.

People v. Lauria (1967)
Court of Appeal of the State of California
251 Cal. App. 2d 471

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть