When SEI started 5 year ago we had several issues: data collection, unbiased assessment of results and their slicing per member state.

While there has been a trend to pick a few case studies with a subsequent assumption that generalisation can be derived. In our quest to bring more database info and less bias, we went the extra mile and started collecting quantitative data for each company.

We moved from the small individual to the big crowd by showing aggregated impact.

The strength of ESA Space Solution is in the pack rather than the single case study reducing the risk of bias. Through surveys, data scraping and public databases we scour the data globe to distil the aggregate achievements leaving no-one behind.

The methodology hinges on the proven 10 SEI indicators for consistency and backward compatibility. Such indicators have been used successfully and agreed with Member States and within ESA: this is the list to be used for commercial application impact assessment.

Get in contact at [ Ссылка ]

свернуть