23-0231
Pub. Util. Comm’n of Tex v. Luminant Energy Co.
From the Third Court of Appeals (3 petitions)

This case raises questions of administrative law and judicial authority. The first issue is whether the Public Utility Commission exceeded its statutory authority by twice directing the Electric Reliability Council of Texas to affix electricity prices at $9000/MWh. The second issue is whether the court of appeals had the power, two years later, to unwind transactions with final settlement prices based upon those expired directives.
Petitioner, Public Utility Commission of Texas, will be represented by Lanora C. Pettit (Office of the Attorney General), from Austin.
Petitioners, Calpine Corporation and Talen Energy Corporation, will be represented by Macey Reasoner Stokes (Baker Botts L.L.P.), from Houston.
Respondent will be represented by Allyson N. Ho (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP), from Dallas.


22-1167
In re Richardson Motorsports
From Dallas County and the Fifth Court of Appeals
The issue in this case is whether E.B.’s healthcare records are privileged from discovery when E.B. is seeking mental-anguish damages in a negligence and bystander recovery suit.

Relator will be represented by R. Brent Cooper (Cooper & Scully, P.C.), from Dallas.
Real Parties in Interest will be represented by Mark C. Sparks
(The Ferguson Law Firm, LLP), from Beaumont.


23-0697
State of Texas v. Loe
From Travis County and the 201st District Court

This case involves a challenge under the Texas Constitution to a statutory prohibition on the provision of certain medical treatments to children experiencing gender dysphoria.

Appellants will be represented by Natalie D. Thompson
(Office of the Attorney General), from Austin.
Appellees will be represented by Kennon L. Wooten
(Scott, Douglass & McConnico LLP), from Austin.

свернуть