"Jim, I give Floyd a 10-7 for knocking Chico Corrales down 3 times. Most judges will not give a less then 10-7 cause it puts the other guy to far outta the fight..." Harold Letterman 1-20-2001 Floyd Mayweather vs Diego "Chico" Corrales
"You absolutely have to give Manny Pacquiao a 10-6 round for the 3 knockdowns..." Harold Letterman 5-8-2004 Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez I
I'm not saying it's right or wrong either way. I just dislike glaring inconsistency.
This is a greatly entertaining fight. We get to see pretty much all of the necessary elements that, when added together equal great fight. Then, these two guys went and did it another three times. Boxing fans are really lucky in that regard, but, c'mon, is any of that appreciated by the global boxing fan community, ya think? Can the fan community be happy with that fact? Oh hell no! No fucking way! Not at all when there's something that allows for the fanbase to complain about something! I'm of course alluding to the scoring controversy that get's many peoples ladies underwear all sorts up and twisted. This is the reason why included the two Harold Lederman quotes you can see up above this.
I know that 3-4 of the rds the sync ain't so hot. Apologies
