(7 Jun 2024)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
London, UK - 28 March 2023
1. Various of Prince Harry leaving court

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Wellington, Florida - 12 April 2024
2. Various of Prince Harry and his wife Meghan, Duke and Duchess of Sussex, arriving at polo event
3. Various of Prince Harry playing polo
4. Various of closing ceremony, crowd applause

ASSOCIATED PRESS
London - 3 June 2022
5. Wide of Prince Harry and Meghan arriving at St Paul's Cathedral for service to mark Queen Elizabeth II's jubilee

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Dusseldorf, Germany - 6 September 2022
6. Medium zoom out Prince Harry and Meghan walking on red carpet
7. Tilt up of Harry and Meghan posing for photographers

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Windsor, UK - 10 September 2022
8. Wide of Prince and Princess of Wales, Prince Harry and Meghan looking at floral tributes following the death of Queen Elizabeth II
9. Various of Prince Harry and Meghan greeting crowd

CLIENTS PLEASE NOTE: SHOTS BELOW CONTAINS FLASH PHOTOGRAPHY
ASSOCIATED PRESS
New York - 6 December 2022
10. Medium zoom out the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Harry and Meghan, RFK Human Rights President Kerry Kennedy and Co-Founder of Siris, Frank Baker, at the Ripple of Hope Awards
11. Close of Meghan and Harry
12. Medium Meghan, Harry and Kennedy posing on the red carpet

CLIENTS PLEASE NOTE: SHOT BELOW CONTAINS FLASH PHOTOGRAPHY
ASSOCIATED PRESS
London - 5 March 2020
13. Medium shot Prince Harry and wife Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, entering Mansion House
STORYLINE:
Prince Harry has been given permission to appeal the British government’s rejection to provide him with publicly funded police protection in the U.K.

The Court of Appeal gave the Duke of Sussex the go-ahead to challenge a ruling earlier this year in the High Court. The permission was granted in May but only reported Thursday.

Judge Peter Lane ruled in February that a government panel’s decision to provide “bespoke” security on an as-needed basis after Harry quit as a working member of the royal family was not unlawful, irrational or unjustified.

“Insofar as the case-by-case approach may otherwise have caused difficulties, they have not been shown to be such as to overcome the high hurdle so as to render the decision-making irrational,” Lane wrote.

The long-running fight began more than four years ago when Harry first challenged the panel’s decision, arguing that he and his family need an armed security detail because of hostility directed toward him and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, on social media and relentless hounding by the news media.

Harry, 39, the younger son of King Charles III, has bucked royal family convention to challenge the government in court and sue the tabloid press.

He won a big victory in December after a judge found phone hacking at Mirror Group Newspapers was “widespread and habitual.” He has two similar cases remaining against the publishers of The Sun and Daily Mail.

The security case appeared to be dead after the High Court in April rejected his first request to appeal Lane’s decision. But Justice David Bean on the Court of Appeal said on May 23 that he could challenge the lower court decision.


===========================================================

Clients are reminded to adhere to all listed restrictions and to check the terms of their licence agreements. For further assistance, please contact the AP Archive on: Tel +44(0)2074827482 Email: info@aparchive.com.

Find out more about AP Archive: [ Ссылка ]
Twitter: [ Ссылка ]
Facebook: [ Ссылка ] ​​
Instagram: [ Ссылка ]


You can license this story through AP Archive: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть