When we discuss weapon transitions In CQB, as of changing from a primary to a secondary weapon system, we tend to make a clear difference of conduct, between Reactive to proactive weapon transitioning.

What we see often in classes or joint training is that most individuals are used only to practice and conduct weapon transitions in a reactive manner, which is initiated by the need to swap one empty or malfunctioned weapon by another that functions. As a result, when required to change a weapon in a deliberate manner, they would become less efficient.

In a reactive weapon transition, the leading goal isn't to control but primarily movement, and secondarily shooting, since the individual is recovering from a failure, and probably in close proximity to a threat. As a result, the chain of actions which the individual is trained to conduct isn’t relevant or efficient at least, in comparison to proactive transitions.

In a proactive weapon transition, the individual is first and foremost in control. In addition, he is static and able to properly reach his secondary weapon system while maintaining a line of sight and control to the point of interest. Deliberate weapon transition Takes place when :

1. The individual is Proactive

2.in close proximity to danger or possible threat location. for example in the narrow upon approach to the threshold.

3. when time, distance and context allows

Train accordingly.

Connect with Us !



Twitter - twitter.com/projectgecko?lang=de

Facebook - www.facebook.com/projectgecko/

Our Web Address - www.projectgecko.info

YouTube - www.youtube.com/channel/UCS1AXuf6ohloZbE6Gc1a5_A?view_as=subscriber

свернуть