When do gun kits and parts turn into legal firearms? How does the recent pistol brace ATF ruling impact this? What is constructive intent when dealing with firearms, and how does it ACTUALLY work in court? Do parts become gun via constructive intent only when they are fully assembled, mostly assembled, somewhat assembled, or can completely unassembled parts be legally considered a firearm? What about if you have multiple different parts that could fit the same firearm, like different barrel lengths, and one of them turns it into an ILLEGAL SBR and another makes it a LEGAL rifle or pistol?

Attorney Tom Grieve breaks down the status of the law in clear English and walks you through:

1) Cases and statutes
2) ATF opinion
3) Three critical tips to stay out of prison

Below is a list of some of the cases and materials referenced in this video.

POST UP YOUR QUESTIONS AND THOUGHTS!

Contents of this video:

0:00 - Intro
1:01 - Internet & Gun Store Myth
1:59 - Constructive Possession
4:20 - Mens Rea
5:32 - Why Constructive Intent?
6:41 - Case #1: Staples v. United States
8:01 - Case #2: United States v. Thompson-Center
15:06 - Case #3: United States v. Drasen
17:45 - Bottom Line Takeaways

US v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.
[ Ссылка ]

US v. Drasen
[ Ссылка ]

ATF Rule 2011-4
[ Ссылка ]

#2ndamendment #constructiveintent #pistolbrace

свернуть