The defendant was convicted of murder and possessing firearms without a license. They filed post-verdict motions, which were denied by the appellate court. The defendant argued that the trial court made errors in jury selection, instruction, and the admission of evidence. They also claimed that their counsel was ineffective. The court reviewed each claim and found them to be without merit.
Commonwealth v. Hathaway (1985)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
347 Pa. Super. 134, 500 A.2d 443
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
