The case involves a corporation from Arkansas being sued by a Missouri farmer for damages caused by a chemical marketed by the corporation. The corporation argues that the Missouri court does not have jurisdiction in this case. The court examines the origin and reasons for the rule that actions for injury to real estate must be brought where the land is located and whether Arkansas courts can hear a lawsuit for damages to real property located in another state.

Reasor-Hill Corp. v. Harrison (1952)
Arkansas Supreme Court
220 Ark. 521, 249 S.W.2d 994

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть