It is correct proposition of law that constitutional petition against interim orders passed by the Courts below is not maintainable, but it is not an absolute rule and case has to be dealt with keeping in view peculiar facts and circumstances.
2020 CLC 768
----------------------‐----------------
Though there are concurrent findings and this Court always exercises restraint while interfering with such conclusion especially in constitutional jurisdiction, but this by itself is not rule of thumb. Any illegality or perversity in the proceedings of the Courts below offending the rights of litigants neither can be protected nor perpetuated and this Court cannot shut its eyes only for the reasons that the unanimous orders were under challenge before it, despite being illegal.
2020 CLC 768

свернуть