Recently a YouTube channel by the name of Fredda put out a video titled "How Alt-History Can Be Dangerous", in which he claimed the genre was a pipeline for far-right propaganda, and was regularly utilized to skew history, however in this video Fredda goes on to produce his own warped take on history from a seeming lens of critical theory, arguing that the mainstream historic narrative cannot be trusted, and then proceeds to provide a clearly left-leaning take upon a major Cold War issue from a video pulled from Monsieur Z. Fredda's argument is not only false, but itself dangerous to history as a study by dismissing facts on the grounds that they MUST be biased, and this kind of thinking is a gateway to bad history.
VIDEO: [ Ссылка ]
DISCORD: [ Ссылка ]
TWITTER: [ Ссылка ]
INSTAGRAM: [ Ссылка ]
MUSIC:
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
Fredda is WRONG about History
Теги
How Alt-History Can Be DangerousFredda is WRONG about HistoryWhat if the Bay of Pigs Invasion SucceededFreddaHistoryAlt-historyAlthistoryMonsieur ZMister ZAlternateAlternate HistoryWhat ifHistory explainedWhat is historyHistorianHistorian explainsCommentaryReactReactionAlternate History HubWhatifalthistCritical Race TheoryLost CauseCultural Marxism16191619 ProjectCynical Historian1776 CommissionAlt right historyInept Fredda
