Book summary of “Limitarianism”
by Ingrid Robeyns.


In "Limitarianism: A Philosophical Defense of the Idea that We Should Set Limits to How Much Wealth Individuals Can Accumulate," Ingrid Robeyns presents a thought-provoking argument for rethinking the distribution of wealth and income in society. The book delves into the ethical implications of extreme wealth inequality and proposes a framework for addressing this issue through the concept of limitarianism.

Robeyns begins by examining the staggering levels of wealth disparity prevalent in contemporary societies, highlighting the negative consequences such disparities can have on social cohesion, political stability, and individual well-being. Drawing on insights from moral philosophy, political theory, and economics, she challenges the notion that unlimited accumulation of wealth is morally justifiable or conducive to the common good.

Central to Robeyns' argument is the principle that there should be upper limits to how much wealth individuals can possess. She argues that such limits are necessary to ensure a fair distribution of resources and to prevent the concentration of economic power in the hands of a few. By capping individual wealth, limitarianism aims to promote greater equality of opportunity and to reduce the influence of money on politics and decision-making processes.

Robeyns acknowledges that determining the precise threshold for wealth limits is a complex task that requires careful consideration of various factors, including social norms, economic conditions, and the need to respect individual autonomy. However, she suggests that a reasonable starting point for setting such limits could be based on the concept of "sufficientarianism," which holds that everyone should have access to a certain threshold of resources necessary for a decent standard of living.

Throughout the book, Robeyns engages with potential objections to limitarianism, including concerns about its feasibility, its impact on incentives for innovation and entrepreneurship, and its compatibility with liberal democratic principles. She responds to these objections by emphasizing the flexibility and adaptability of the limitarian framework, as well as its potential to foster a more inclusive and sustainable form of capitalism.

In addition to outlining the theoretical foundations of limitarianism, Robeyns also explores practical policy proposals for implementing wealth limits, such as progressive taxation, wealth redistribution schemes, and regulations on inheritance and corporate governance. She argues that while these measures may face resistance from powerful vested interests, they are essential for realizing the ethical goals of limitarianism and building a more just and equitable society.

Overall, "Limitarianism" offers a compelling vision for reimagining the distribution of wealth and income in the 21st century. By challenging the status quo of unlimited accumulation and advocating for greater economic fairness, Ingrid Robeyns makes a significant contribution to the ongoing debate about inequality and social justice. Whether or not one fully embraces the principles of limitarianism, this book is sure to stimulate critical reflection and inspire further inquiry into alternative models of economic organization and governance.

свернуть