📚Book link: [ Ссылка ]

✅ Amazon Web Service Application Load Balancer

Layer 7 Load Balancing: Application Load Balancer operates at the Open System Interconnect model's application at Layer 7. It can make routing decisions based on the content of the HTTP/HTTPS headers, URL paths, query strings, and more.

Features:
* Content-Based Routing: Application Load Balancer allows you to route traffic based on request content, making it ideal for modern application architectures, including microservices and container-based applications.
* Host and Path-Based Routing: You can route traffic based on the domain name (host) or the URL path specified in the request.
* Support for HTTP/2 and WebSocket: It supports advanced web protocols, which are beneficial for improving performance and real-time communication.
* Integration with Amazon Web Service Services: Application Load Balancer integrates well with other Amazon Web Service services, such as Elastic Container Service, Elastic Kubernetes Service, and Web Application Firewall.

Use Cases:

Applications that need intelligent routing based on content.
Microservices architecture where different services are served at different paths or hostnames.
Web applications requiring WebSocket or HTTP/2 capabilities.

✅ Network Load Balancer (NLB)

Layer 4 Load Balancing: NLB operates at the transport layer (Layer 4). It routes traffic based on IP protocol data, such as TCP port and IP address.

Features:
* High Performance and Low Latency: NLB is optimized to handle millions of requests per second while maintaining low latencies.
* Static IP or Elastic IP: Unlike Application Load Balancer, NLB allows the assignment of a static IP per Availability Zone or the use of Elastic IP addresses.
* Direct TCP and UDP Traffic Routing: Supports routing of TCP and UDP traffic, making it suitable for applications that require direct connection to the load balancer.
* Zonal Isolation: Traffic is isolated by an Availability Zone, which can enhance fault tolerance.

Use Cases:

* Applications that require high performance and low latency.
* TCP or UDP-based applications, such as gaming servers or stock trading platforms.
* Situations where a static or elastic IP address is necessary for whitelisting in firewalls.

Choosing Between Application Load Balancer and NLB

* Protocol and Routing Requirements: If your application requires complex routing based on the content of the HTTP/HTTPS headers or needs WebSocket support, choose Application Load Balancer. If your application primarily uses TCP or UDP and benefits from low latency and high throughput, go with NLB.

* Performance Considerations: For ultra-high performance and low latency requirements, NLB is typically more suitable because of its ability to handle volatile high traffic patterns and its operational efficiency at the TCP level.

* IP Address Needs: If having a static IP is crucial for your application deployment, NLB would be the better choice.

* Integration and Features: Consider the additional features like Web Application Firewall integration or the need for detailed routing rules, which might lean towards Application Load Balancer.

Understanding these under-the-hood mechanics and features can help you better decide which load balancer best meets your application's needs.

свернуть