I don't like doing film reviews because I feel as though I have to shoot a ton of the stuff before giving an honest opinion. However, I've shot Kodak Tri-X 400 for three years now, and decided to document my personal comparison to Ilford HP5+ after looking for a more budget friendly black and white film. This is also my first attempt at being more personal on camera, hence the extra layer of anxiousness.
If you'd like to me to do a Part 2, and actually go hard into a comparison, just let me know in the comments and don't forget to buy a shirt or send me some well wishes.
Support the Channel, buy some stuff!
Etsy
[ Ссылка ]
Amazon Print on Demand
[ Ссылка ]
Social Media:
Manuel:
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
Recording:
Nikon D5500
GoPro Hero5
Camera Gear:
Canon AE-1 Program
Canon 35mm f2.8 FD
Film:
Kodak Tri-X 400
Ilford HP5+
Music By:
Lowkey // Just Shine
Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5+ (ISO 1600 Low-Light Test)
Теги
analog photographyilford hp5+35mm filmhp5+pushing filmkodak tri-x 400tri-x 400kodak tri-x vs ilford hp5kodak vs ilfordtrix 400kodak tri xilford vs kodakilford hp5 plus 400ilford hp5 pushed to 1600ilford hp5 vs kodak tri xtri x vs hp5hp5 vs tri xkodak tri-x 400 vs ilford hp5kodak tri x 400 vs ilford hp5hp5 pushedilford hp5 plus 400 black and white filmtri x 400ilford hp5how to120 filmkodak 400tx
