Scientist, Dr Susan Oliver and Julie the dog examine the study, SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro, which is being used by antivaxxers to spread misinformation about vaccines. They show how the study is deceptive and deeply flawed and that its conclusions aren’t supported by the data. Furthermore, they show that the claims being made by antivaxxers aren’t even supported by the study’s conclusions.
I'm happy to say that the journal have now retraacted this paper at the request of one of the authors:
[ Ссылка ]
Buy me a coffee (or Julie a treat) [ Ссылка ]
Chapters
0:00 Introduction
0:54 The study
2:02 Spike protein goes into the nucleus?
2:45 Study disputing findings
3:16 Deception by omission
3:57 2nd study disputing findings
5:17 No control for artefacts
6:12 DNA repair (Comet assay)
7:29 No positive or negative controls
8:44 V(D)J Recombination
9:34 Antivaxxer claims
Links to studies
SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro
[ Ссылка ]
A systemic and molecular study of subcellular localization of SARS-CoV-2 proteins
[ Ссылка ]
SARS-CoV-2–host proteome interactions for antiviral drug discovery
[ Ссылка ]
Deceptive spike protein study vs The Science
Теги
Dr Susan OliverBack to the scienceSpike proteinspike protein goes to nucleusspike proteins explainedspike protein dna damagespike protein dna damage repairspike protein dna repairspike protein cancerVaccine spike proteinCOVIDCOVID vaccinein vitropositive controlnegative controlswedish study spike proteinswedish studyantivaxxerantivaxxersantivaxersanti vaxxeranti vaxeranti vaxxersanti vaxersmisinformation