Skeptical NT scholar Bart Ehrman thinks that the idea that Jesus is Yahweh is more of a modern development in Christian theology. On his blog, Ehrman says "I can’t think of any ancient Christian source that talks about Jesus as Yahweh himself. Jesus is the son of Yahweh."
In a previous video I’ve looked at several early Christian theologians from the first three centuries of the church who seemed to believe that Jesus was Yahweh. Several thoughtful people in the comments have pointed out in the comments that Jesus is not explicitly called Yahweh and so therefore I’m misreading or mischaracterizing Ehrman.
So was I missing the point or knocking down a strawman? I don’t think so.
Help support me: [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ] for a one-time gift
Amazon wish list: [ Ссылка ]
Join this channel to get access to perks:
[ Ссылка ]
Get merch: [ Ссылка ]
Visit my blog: [ Ссылка ]
Bart Ehrman is WRONG. The NT Teaches That Jesus is Yahweh.
Теги
christian apologeticstestify erik manningchristianityapologeticsbart ehrmanjesus is godchristologyhow jesus became god bart ehrmanearly christologylarry hurtadoinspiring philosophycapturing christianitymike wingerwhaddo you memeunitarianincarnationmodalismtrinitarianismbiblejesus is yahwehanthony rogersjesus is yahweh in hte fleshjesus is yahweh steven bancarzjesus christjesus is god debatejesus is god in the flesh
