Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 35,900 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks ► [ Ссылка ]
Grotts v. Zahner | 989 P.2d 415 (1999)
A person injured by someone else’s tortious actions can often claim damages for pain and suffering, even for emotional suffering. But courts have traditionally been reluctant to award damages for emotional suffering to plaintiffs who don’t suffer physical injury. Grotts versus Zahner represents one court’s approach to the issue.
John Colwell died when he and his fiancée, Kellie Grotts, were in a car crash with Gertrude Zahner. At the time Colwell died, he and Grotts were deeply in love and expected to marry in the near future.
Grotts sued Zahner, seeking damages for bystander emotional distress Grotts suffered watching her fiancé die. The trial court dismissed her claim, and Grotts appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: [ Ссылка ]
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! [ Ссылка ]
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: [ Ссылка ]
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel [ Ссылка ]
Quimbee Case Brief App [ Ссылка ]
Facebook [ Ссылка ]
Twitter [ Ссылка ]
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Grotts v. Zahner Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Теги
Grotts v. Zahnerbriefsquimbeelaw casecase brief examplebrief casecase briefpress briefcase summarieslegal briefhow to brief a casecase brief templatelegal brief casehow to write a case brieflegal brief examplesample case briefcase brief formatexample of a brieflaw briefslegal brief definitionwhat is a brief in lawwhat is a case briefcourt briefbrief definition lawlegal brief templatefacts of the casecase summary example
