In Part Two of our two-part mini-series we discuss the work of Ernst Bloch’s The Principle of Hope. We ask what difference there is between the thought of Bloch and Theodor Adorno, how hope and utopia enable political action, and why so many traditions seem to abhor the concept of utopia. Expand your horizons and come learn how to hope again in this episode!

This is a clip from Episode 51, "Hermeneutics and Utopia: From Hans-Georg Gadamer to Ernst Bloch (Part Two)." The full episode is a Patreon exclusive, so subscribe to listen to the rest!

⬇️ 𝙂𝙚𝙩 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚:

𝙋𝙖𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙤𝙣: [ Ссылка ]
𝙏𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧: [ Ссылка ]
𝙒𝙚𝙗𝙨𝙞𝙩𝙚: [ Ссылка ]

📚𝙍𝙚𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨:

Ernst Bloch, The Principle of Hope, vols. 1 &3, trans. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice & Paul Knight (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1986).

Ernst Bloch and Theodor Adorno, “Something’s Missing: A Discussion between Ernst Bloch and Theodor W. Adorno on the Contradictions of Utopian Longing (1964)” in Ernst Bloch, The Utopian Function of Art and Literature, trans. Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1988).

🎶𝙈𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙘: "Vintage Memories" by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

🎧𝙁𝙞𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙙𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩:

𝘼𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚: [ Ссылка ]
𝙎𝙥𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙮: [ Ссылка ]

🎙𝘼𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙋𝙤𝙙𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩:

What’s Left of Philosophy is a podcast where four leftist friends get together to talk about concepts, thinkers, and texts from the history of philosophy and political theory.

Sometimes we talk about how good and useful certain ideas are for left theory and practice. Sometimes we mercilessly dunk on bourgeois idealism dressed up as radical thought. Sometimes we’re joined by extremely cool guests. We love concepts and long for an emancipated existence!

Episodes come out every two weeks on all major platforms. Most episodes are freely available for everyone, but supporters on Patreon get access to exclusive episodes and bonus content.

свернуть