👇We Have A Patreon!👇
[ Ссылка ]

Crispin Glover vs. Back to the Future Part II

In 1989, actor Crispin Glover made headlines not for a new role but for a lawsuit that would change Hollywood's handling of actor likeness rights forever. Glover, who portrayed George McFly in the original Back to the Future (1985), did not return for the sequel due to disagreements over salary and other creative differences. Rather than recasting the role, the filmmakers took a controversial approach—they used special effects, including prosthetics and old footage, to make it appear as if Glover was still in the movie.

This decision sparked outrage from Glover, who claimed that his likeness had been used without his permission. In a groundbreaking move, he sued Universal Pictures, arguing that the studio had effectively deceived the audience by implying he was part of Back to the Future Part II when he was not.

The lawsuit raised important questions about the use of an actor's likeness and how far studios could go in recreating a performance without the actor's consent. Glover ultimately won a settlement of $760,000, but the impact of the case extended far beyond the financial compensation. The case set a significant legal precedent, leading to changes in Hollywood contracts that now often include specific clauses addressing the use of an actor's likeness.

Glover’s victory highlighted the importance of an actor’s control over their image and brought attention to the ethical implications of using technology to manipulate or replicate performances. Today, the case is often cited in discussions about digital effects, deepfakes, and the evolving relationship between actors and studios. Glover's stand against the unauthorized use of his likeness remains a pivotal moment in the industry's history, ensuring that actors retain more control over how their image is used on screen.

[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]

Crispin Glover vs. Back to the Future Part II
[ Ссылка ]

#shorts

свернуть