The extraordinarily low rates of chronic disease among plant-based populations have been attributed to fiber, but reductionist thinking may lead us astray.
New subscribers to our e-newsletter always receive a free gift. Get yours here: [ Ссылка ]
My video Solving a Colon Cancer Mystery ([ Ссылка ]) is a perfect example of the concept I presented above. If fiber was really the key, then sub-Saharan Africa would be rife with colorectal cancer these days.
For an extreme example, how about disease reversal with diet centered around white rice? See Kempner Rice Diet: Whipping Us Into Shape ([ Ссылка ]) and Drugs and the Demise of the Rice Diet ([ Ссылка ].
Wait a second, though, didn’t I just have a video saying you should specifically look for fiber? The Five to One Fiber Rule ([ Ссылка ]) is just a way to identify less processed foods using fiber as a marker of whole foods.
For more intrigue in the world of fiber, check out Does Fiber Really Prevent Diverticulosis? ([ Ссылка ])
And if you’re thinking “Dr. Who?” then, for a historical perspective: Dr. Burkitt’s F-word Diet ([ Ссылка ])
Have a question for Dr. Greger about this video? Leave it in the comment section at [ Ссылка ] and he'll try to answer it!
Image Credit: Eric Allix Rogers and rick via Flickr, and Elizabeth Magner.
[ Ссылка ]
• Subscribe: [ Ссылка ]
• Donate: [ Ссылка ]
• Podcast : [ Ссылка ]
• Facebook: www.facebook.com/NutritionFacts.org
• Twitter: www.twitter.com/nutrition_facts
• Instagram: www.instagram.com/nutrition_facts_org
• Books: [ Ссылка ]
• Shop: [ Ссылка ]
Is the Fiber Theory Wrong?
Теги
fibercardiovascular healthcardiovascular diseaseheart healthheart diseaseDr. Denis Burkittplant-based dietsphytonutrientssupplementsfruitvegetablesnutsgrainsbeansUgandaAfricamortalityanimal productsstandard American dietbreadchronic diseasesmeatdairyeggsreductionismIs the Fiber Theory Wrongfiber theoryhow not to dienutrition factsnutritionfacts.orgmichael gregerdr michael gregerdr gregordr. greger