Visit this page: [ Ссылка ]

COMPARING THE SOCRATIC METHOD TO NLP
The Socratic Method has three main steps:
1. State the belief, assertion, opinion.
2. Look for evidence to support the belief.
3. Challenge assumptions.

The NLP Meta Model and the NLP Peace Mapping Models are far superior in that they give you a structure and a questioning methodology that invites you to challenge the topic from every possible angle in order to discover high quality information.
The Socratic questioning technique is more for philosophers whereas the NLP Meta Model and NLP Peace Mapping Models are for seekers of truth.
The Socratic Method lacks a detailed questioning structure whereas the NLP Meta Model and NLP Peace Mapping Models give you a precise questioning methodology.

Take a look at the NLP Peace Mapping Model - and learn how to unleash the power of the NLP Meta Model.
[ Ссылка ]

The NLP Meta Model has three categories. Distortions, generalisations and deletions. And using the acrostic MLCCP UM NUS to help us memorise it we get:

A. DISTORTIONS
1. Mind Reading
2. Lost Performative
3. Cause and Effect
4. Complex Equivalence
5. Presuppositions

B. GENERALISATIONS
6. Universal Quantifiers
7. Modal Operators

C. DELETIONS
8. Nominalisations
9. Unspecified Verbs
10. Simple Deletions

So far we have covered Mind Reads, Lost Performatives, Cause and Effect, Complex Equivalence, Presuppositions, Universal Quantifiers, Modal Operators, Nominalisations and Unspecified Verbs. In this session we look at Simple Deletions.

There are a number of types of Deletions. We are going to look at three of those categories to give you the idea how they work. We start with Simple Deletions.


SIMPLE DELETION
There is a deletion when we sense that some information is missing from the statement. The way to check is by attempting to build a clear representation in the cinema of your mind? Start by asking yourself, "What is missing from this statement?", then ask questions like, "About what? About whom? What do you mean by that? What specifically?"

Example 1
So we start with the example, "I am not comfortable with this."
We challenge the Simple Deletion by asking, "Not comfortable about what?"
And the answer that we get could be, "About giving the waiter my credit card."

UNSPECIFIED REFERENTIAL INDEX
An Unspecified Referential Index is where the phrase fails to specify a person or thing. For example, words like, "It, she, he, they, we, us, you, one, someone.", and generalisations which refer to a group like, "Australians, the British, the man in the street, people, Christians, politicians, journalists". Gather more information by asking, "Who, what or which specifically?"

Example 1
So we start with the example, "They say that you need to drink two litres of water every day."
We challenge that statement by asking, "Who specifically says that you need to drink two litres of water every day?"
And the answer that we get could be, "I heard it from my taxi driver."

COMPARATIVE DELETION
A comparative deletion is where there is a comparison involving a greater or lesser value in which what is being compared is not specified. As in words ending in 'er' and 'est'. "Better, best, less, least, worst, more, bigger, lighter, smaller, very, even."

Recover the comparative deletion by asking questions like, "Better than who or what specifically? Compared to whom or what specifically?"

Example 1
So we start with the example, “She is really good”.
We challenge the Comparative Deletion by asking, “Compared to whom?”
Or we could treat it as a Simple Deletion and ask, “She is really good at what?”


*** There are 12 NLP Meta Model videos in this series. Make sure you watch all of them.

DOWNLOAD A FREE COPY OF THE EBOOK
[ Ссылка ]

Take a look at the NLP Peace Mapping online course
[ Ссылка ]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can find Abby Eagle at [ Ссылка ]
NLP Hypnotherapy and Meditation
Gold Coast, Australia

свернуть