Peer review can be a stressful process for scientific authors. How should you respond to reviewer criticisms? What if a reviewer personally attacks you or makes unfounded statements about your paper? How you respond can determine the final outcome of the review process. In this video, I offer five tips on how to respond to reviewer comments and how to prepare a reconciliation document to accompany your revised manuscript. I specifically address the situation in which a paper has been provisionally accepted with major revision or has been rejected but invited for resubmission after revision.
If you liked this video, you may also enjoy these videos:
8 Ways Your Scientific Writing Will Annoy Reviewers: [ Ссылка ]
How to Write a Scientific Paper When You Have Negative Results: [ Ссылка ]
If you use video in your research or would like to make a video about your research, check out my other YouTube channel, The Scientist Videographer: [ Ссылка ]
Follow me on Twitter: @SciWri_KLMcKee
How to Respond to Critical Reviews
Теги
Scientific writingpeer reviewscientific writing skillshow to respond to critical reviewshow to write a scientific papercritical review of journal articlehow to handle critical reviewhow to write wellHow to write a scientific paperresearch paperhow to get a scientific paper publishedscientific writing and critical thinkingscientific writing tipscareer in scientific researchscientific writing stylerespond to reviewers' comments