Peer review can be a stressful process for scientific authors. How should you respond to reviewer criticisms? What if a reviewer personally attacks you or makes unfounded statements about your paper? How you respond can determine the final outcome of the review process. In this video, I offer five tips on how to respond to reviewer comments and how to prepare a reconciliation document to accompany your revised manuscript. I specifically address the situation in which a paper has been provisionally accepted with major revision or has been rejected but invited for resubmission after revision.

If you liked this video, you may also enjoy these videos:

8 Ways Your Scientific Writing Will Annoy Reviewers: [ Ссылка ]
How to Write a Scientific Paper When You Have Negative Results: [ Ссылка ]

If you use video in your research or would like to make a video about your research, check out my other YouTube channel, The Scientist Videographer: [ Ссылка ]

Follow me on Twitter: @SciWri_KLMcKee

свернуть