Donald Trump's lawyers are attempting to have his guilty verdict on criminal charges related to hush money payments to a porn star overturned, citing the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, which they claim prohibits using evidence of official acts in a private matter. The defense argues that prosecutors improperly used evidence of Trump's conversations with Hope Hicks and his Twitter posts while in office, which they claim were official acts, to secure his conviction. The outcome of the case is significant, as it could have implications for Trump's ability to communicate with the public and potentially chill his willingness to do so, with Trump's lawyers warning that allowing such evidence in a criminal case would set a dangerous precedent.

свернуть