An in-depth analysis of Blade Runner 2049.
In this video I cover the best parts of the film, explore what makes a good sequel, respond to criticisms of 2049, and conclude with the various flaws 2049 suffers as a sequel to Blade Runner.
Videos I respond to:
Rob Ager - [ Ссылка ]
Rageaholic - [ Ссылка ]
Michael Snow - [ Ссылка ]
E;R - [ Ссылка ]
Movieweb - [ Ссылка ]
Cinemasins - [ Ссылка ]
0:00 - Intro
1:38 - Blade Runner
5:56 - Blade Runner 2049
9:13 - Joi
13:47 - Luv
19:40 - What Makes A Good Sequel?
34:54 - Response to Criticisms of Blade Runner 2049
36:45 - Response to Rob Ager's criticism
46:08 - Response to Rageaholic's criticism
48:10 - Response to Michael Snow's criticism
50:01 - Response to E;R's criticism
57:30 - Response to Movieweb's criticism
1:07:31 - Response to Cinema Sins' criticism
1:14:02 - Flaws with Blade Runner 2049 as a Sequel (conclusion)
Second Channel - [ Ссылка ]
Rando Discord - [ Ссылка ]
Patreon - [ Ссылка ]
Twitter - [ Ссылка ]
Blade Runner 2049 - A Masterpiece... But A Terrible Sequel?
Теги
random film talkreviewfilmmoviemovie reviewfilm reviewreviewsscenecliptrailerteaserblade runnerblade runner 2049blade runner 2049 analysisvideo essayfilm analysismovie analysismovie essayharrison fordryan goslingrob agererrageaholicmichael snowcinemasinsmoviewebdenis villeneuvecyberpunkhans zimmerreplicantanalyzedroger deakinscinematographycomparisonmasterpieceblade runner video essayblade runner 2049 video essay