Jimmy Warren was convicted of having a firearm without permission. The police stopped him because they thought he was involved in a burglary. They found no evidence of involvement but stopped and searched him anyway. The court had to decide whether or not the police had the right to do this.
The most relevant facts are that the police stopped Warren without any specific reason to think he was involved in the burglary, and they found no evidence to suggest he was involved. The victim only told the police that he saw three black men running away from his house.
Commonwealth v. Warren (2016)
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
475 Mass. 530
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
