Subscribe here: [ Ссылка ] The relation with China? Certainly, we have to keep our relations with China, why should [we] not? We have to keep our relations with China because, as you know, our trade, investment and economic relations are so big that it is impossible to think about decoupling. Nobody is talking about it. But certainly, this relation has to be based on an understanding.
The Foreign Affairs Ministers approved a text presented to [the] Gymnich [meeting], and now, this text will be used by the leaders to give more guidance. Yes, China is the three things we said: a rival, a competitor, [and] a partner. We have to operationalise these concepts. What does it mean, each one of them? How do we put them into practice?
But, as I said, de-risking is not about China. We do not have to negotiate with China our de-risking, it is our business. It is us – internally – who have to identify, first, which risks we are talking about and, secondly, how do we proceed to decrease these risks. But it is our work. Do not make others be responsible for our line – our full line. It is [up to] us to put a solution to that.
#eudebates the unique initiative aiming to promote debate, dialogue, knowledge, participation and communication among citizens. #China #VonderLeyen #EUCO #NATO #Russia #invasion #Ukraine #PUTIN #WAR #RUSSIA #NATO #guns
![](https://s2.save4k.ru/pic/_5wr5PAsuD8/maxresdefault.jpg)