📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
Law school prep: [ Ссылка ]
Bar exam prep: [ Ссылка ]
Free courses: [ Ссылка ]
❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
Community: [ Ссылка ]
Testimonials: [ Ссылка ]
Submit a review: [ Ссылка ]
📱 TECH
iOS app: [ Ссылка ]
Android app: [ Ссылка ]
📣 ABOUT
Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more—Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
Email: info@studicata.com
Learn more: [ Ссылка ]
🎬 VIDEO INFO
Can you predict what will be tested on the bar exam?
In short, we believe that you can responsibly predict what areas of law within a subject will be tested. However, the problem with bar exam predictions can arise when you try to predict what subjects will be tested.
For example, IF evidence is tested on the essay portion of the bar exam, you can be confident that an issue regarding hearsay will be tested. However, we don’t think anyone can responsibly predict whether evidence will be tested on the essay portion of the bar exam (other than the bar examiners themselves).
The risk of making subject predictions is simply not worth the potential reward. Even if you knew exactly what subjects were going to be tested on the essay portion of the bar exam, it wouldn’t help you as much as you likely think. Generally, 7-9 subjects are tested on the essay portion of the bar exam out of 12 total (some essays test more than 1 subject at a time). So, if you knew what subjects were going to be tested, you could likely neglect preparing for 4/12 (33%) subjects on the essay portion. This would be a nice advantage, but you can come to a similar outcome without neglecting any subjects.
How? Rather than neglecting entire subjects, you could simply cut the bottom 33% from every subject. If you neglected the bottom 33% (the least frequently tested and lowest yielding rules) in each subject, you would reduce your preparation time by the exact same amount. However, under this approach, you are mitigating your risk more efficiently. No matter what subject is tested, you will still know the highest yielding areas of law and likely still be able to write a passing essay. Conversely, if you neglect an entire subject and that subject is tested, you will likely be too unprepared to write a passing essay. In other words, the risk/reward ratio is much better under option 2.
Of course, neither of these methods are recommended. The concept of bar exam predictions only exists, because big bar prep companies throw an utterly incomprehensible amount of material at students. In turn, this forces students to take shortcuts to get through all the material, which inevitably leads to hedging bets and making gambles (i.e., “predictions”).
The real solution is to make your bar prep manageable so that you don’t have to worry about predictions. Ultimately, this is why Studicata exists – to give students a way to efficiently navigate the swathes of bar prep material being disseminated by the big prep companies. The key is to focus on the most tested and highest yielding rules within each subject, rather than guessing what subjects will be tested.
Learn more: [ Ссылка ]
Ещё видео!