Dmitriy Shakhnevich, Esq., in conversation with Eugene Volokh on cancel culture on college campuses, whether cancel culture is a generational phenomenon, immigrant sensitivity to free speech restriction, whether “false information” should be censored online, the “actual malice” requirement in certain defamation cases, social media companies and “hate speech” policies, whether we should protect “hate speech,” Connecticut’s “racial ridicule” law, whether ChatGPT and AI are threats to the legal profession and when robots will replace lawyers.

0:00-1:32: Is cancel culture on college campuses getting better?
1:33-3:15: Is cancel culture a generational phenomenon?
3:16-4:25: Are immigrants more sensitive to free speech restriction in the US?
4:26-7:55: Should “false information” be restricted online?
7:56-12:40: The “actual malice” requirement in public figure defamation cases
12:41-14:35: Should social media platforms have policies that deal with “hate speech?”
14:36-20:24: Should “hate speech” be protected?
20:25-24:23: Connecticut’s “racial ridicule” law
24:24-30:44: Are ChatGPT and AI threats to the legal profession?
30:45-32:18: When will robots replace lawyers?

Dmitriy Shakhnevich, Esq.
The Law Firm of Dmitriy Shakhnevich PLLC
233 Broadway, Suite 900
New York, NY 10279
T: (212) 913-9703
F: (212) 913-9702
E: ds@dshaklaw.com

Disclaimer
Excerpts from books, blogs, social media and public figures are protected by the Fair Use Clause of the Copyright Act, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyrights.

свернуть