Paul's conversion serves as serious evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. That said, we need to be careful to distinguish Paul's visionary experience of seeing Jesus from the experiences of the disciples had with Jesus before his ascension, which were very much multisensory and physical. Some apologists make Paul the paradigm for the resurrection appearances, which can lead to a watering down effect. Simply put, we can't do it all through Paul.

Thanks for your continued support. This is part 4/5 on my series on minimal facts vs. maximal data, and I understand it's been a little different. My heart is to help people make the best case possible.

Source: See this amazing playlist by @Lydia McGrew [ Ссылка ]. See especially: The Conversion of Paul as an Argument for the Resurrection [ Ссылка ]

Help support me: Patreon [ Ссылка ]. You can also do a one-time donation at paypal.me/isjesusalive

Join this channel to get access to perks:
[ Ссылка ]

Get merch: [ Ссылка ]

Visit my blog: isjesusalive.com

свернуть