Pune car accident case | Advocate Asim Saraode says, "On behalf of the intervener, we have argued against granting bail to the father of the accused. The court has rejected the basis on which he was asking for bail and granted him judicial custody till May 24... He tried to present an argument that he had sent a driver with his accused son. Then why was the driver not driving the car and the person with no licence was driving the car... I want to say with clarity that their association with gang members or their status as murderers has nothing to do with this case... The case is well discussed throughout the nation and the father is at fault as he failed to protect his minor son... There is absence of proper provisions to be mentioned in the FIR. Why has the police registered an offence and filed two FIRs is the question and it can be taken to the high court also. There is no mention of the prohibition act and its provisions and there is complete manipulation of the FIR. Maybe the police have been pressurised by someone and that is why they are trying to mislead the court on some level but now societal pressure is compelling the police to be on track of the law..."
#punecarcrash #porsche #porschecrash #topnews #trendingnews #puneporschecrash #latestnews #etnow
Subscribe To ET Now For Latest Updates On Stocks, share market, business News, Trading, Crypto Updates | [ Ссылка ]
To Stay Updated Download the Times Now App :-
Android Google Play : [ Ссылка ]
Apple App Store : [ Ссылка ]
Social Media Links :-
Twitter - [ Ссылка ]
Facebook - [ Ссылка ]
G+ - [ Ссылка ]
Website - www.etnownews.com
Subscribe Now To Our Network Channels:-
Times Now: [ Ссылка ]
Mirror Now: [ Ссылка ]
