English speakers, kindly utilize the "Closed Captions" button to access the English subtitles.

In today's interview, we are honored to host Colonel Oleg Zhdanov, a distinguished member of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. As Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine unfolds, Colonel Zhdanov has emerged as a prominent military expert, sharing his expertise and insights on various Ukrainian TV and media platforms.

In this captivating interview, Colonel Zhdanov sheds light on the following matters:
NATO is planning a direct military action to defend Ukraine
Zalensky: negotiations are only possible on Ukraine's peace plan
Germany's Rheinmetall will build a tank factory in Ukraine
SBU: Russia's rocket production capacity is around 70 missiles a month


In my view, there are several reasons and potential consequences that might be associated with NATO's response to a hypothetical situation where Russia would use nuclear or chemical weapons in Ukraine.

1. Reasons for NATO's potential direct military involvement

Collective defense:
NATO is founded on the principle of collective defense, as outlined in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. If a NATO member state were attacked, it could trigger a collective response from all NATO members, including potential military involvement.

Deterrence:
NATO's military involvement could serve as a deterrent against the use of nuclear or chemical weapons by Russia or any other aggressor. By demonstrating a strong response, NATO aims to discourage further aggression and preserve regional stability.

Protection of allies and security commitments:
NATO has a commitment to the security and well-being of its member states. In the case of Ukraine, if it were to face a severe threat from Russia, NATO could consider direct military involvement to protect Ukraine and uphold its security commitments.

2. Potential consequences of NATO's direct military involvement

Escalation of conflict:
Direct military involvement by NATO in response to Russia's use of nuclear or chemical weapons could escalate the conflict further. This escalation could result in an intensification of violence, increased civilian casualties, and a broader regional crisis.

Risk of wider conflict:
Direct military involvement by NATO could potentially escalate the conflict beyond Ukraine and lead to a broader confrontation with Russia. This would greatly increase the risks and potential consequences for all parties involved.

International diplomatic tensions:
NATO's direct military involvement could strain diplomatic relations between NATO member states and Russia, potentially leading to a deterioration of overall international relations. It may also impact global security dynamics and alliances.


It's important to note that specific plans and actions in response to such a hypothetical situation would depend on various factors, including the political climate, diplomatic efforts, and assessments of the risks and benefits of military intervention. The response of NATO or any other international organization would be determined by real-time developments and decisions made by member states in consultation with one another.

Please provide your perspective on the matter discussed above by sharing your thoughts below.

свернуть