#MakingaMurderer
#StevenAvery
#KathleenZellner
How will Convicting portray Steven as "irrevocably evil" based on uncharged allegations without mentioning the far more egregious charged conduct of Chuck and Earl?
"Steven's brothers Chuck and Earl, both of whom have sex related convictions..."
Will "Convicting A Murderer" does touch on the sexual misconduct of Chuck and Earl? If they do it will only be done in an attempt to poison the well re the allegations of sexual misconduct leveled against Steven. This will be a tricky line for "Convicting" to walk. If they are all monsters, how do we know Chuck and Earl weren't involved? If Brendan is capable why isn't Bobby? I look forward to Convicting's answer to these questions.
"When you became aware that Bobby was taking this picture, you had to have been enraged..."
An easy way to attack Steven's character is to allege he raped his underage niece (the truth is not so clear or inflammatory IMO). **Marie was not Steven's niece by blood, and she was 17 by June 2004 (Baldwin reports the alleged misconduct occurred "in the summer months of 2004").** When first asked in 2004 Marie denied any such contact (so did Bobby, who spent lots of time with Marie and Steven). Marie only admits this after being forced into additional interviews with Baldwin (an officer alleged to have engaged in similar coercion tactics of other witnesses). Even Earl, in 2005, still denied Steven and Marie had sex. Police reported Earl "reluctantly" discussed the fact that Steven engaged in sexually inappropriate contact with his daughter, including touching of her private parts. This is where the state fucked up...
After Earl's interview on 11/9 **Police reported Bobby and "possibly" Steven Avery photographed inappropriate touching of minors, specifically of Earl Avery's children** (DCI 201). However, in the audio Earl only mentions Bobby taking photos of Marie and Steven. Bobby and Steven were questioned about these photos in 2004 (denied anything was wrong with them) but they WERE NOT questioned about them in 2005 or 2006 after this new story emerged about what the photosdepicted (sexually inappropriate touching of a minor). Marie told police she often hung out with Steven AND Bobby. It appears Bobby would have been a *central witness* if Steven was charged by Brown County for an assault on Marie. He never was.
"Your brother [Chuck] doing this sort of thing, I find that very..."
Will Convicting reveal the state knew about the incestuous misconduct of Chuck and Earl, or how despite that knowledge the state didn't attempt to identify the exploited children depicted in the images on the Dassey PC?
Maybe that's why they had to bury the PC. Not only to protect Bobby's credibility for trial, but to prevent focus from turning to the real sexual deviants on the property - Chuck and Earl - who undeniably had the opportunity to commit the crime (and by the state's own logic deviant enough to do so). Now ... what happened 5 years after the state suppressed illicit content (child porn, incest, pedophilia) on the Dassey PC? In 2011 Candy called MTSO to report that Earl Avery was video recording minors changing with a concealed digital camera ... which raises even more questions about the origin of the Dassey PC content (how long had Earl been doing things like that?). And let's face it - IMO if ANY of those 2006 images of incest and pedophilia could have been connected to Steven they would have been. Very publicly. No matter who else it brought down. What was found on the Dassey computer, and who did it incriminate? Not Steven Avery or Brendan Dassey.
Special thanks:
N64 Controller (Archive Master) [ Ссылка ]
Milbillie (Earl Avery audio) [ Ссылка ]
NewScott (Commentary) [ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ] (DCI and Earl Avery reports)
