Episode 365 marks a milestone for the podcast. Listeners can now indulge in an episode of Thinking LSAT every day for a year. Nathan and Ben reflect on some of the hiccups and highlights of their podcasting partnership. Then, they weigh in on a particularly unfavorable early-decision program, debate the merit of a tip for evaluating LSAT answer choices, advise a PhD chemist considering a pivot into IP law, and discuss a host of other topics from the mailbag.
Get your best score with LSAT Demon. Sign up here: [ Ссылка ]
Attend over 30 hours of live LSAT classes every week with a Demon Live subscription: [ Ссылка ]
Use our Law School Scholarship Estimator to see what LSAT score you need to go to law school for free: [ Ссылка ]
Meet the Demon’s amazing LSAT teachers and tutors: [ Ссылка ]
Learn more about Ben, Nathan, and their years of experience teaching the LSAT: [ Ссылка ]
0:00 - Introduction
8:04 - BU Bound
17:42 - Pearls vs. Turds
24:29 - From STEM to IP Law
30:55 - Find Your Best Hour to Study
37:41 - Bad Grades in a Personal Statement?
44:01 - The Opposite of Our Advice
57:38 - You Don’t Need a Curriculum
1:10:55 - Reaching the 170s
1:16:04 - Screw You, LSAT! (Just Kidding)
A Year of Thinking LSAT (Ep. 365)
Теги
lsatthinking lsatThinking LSATThinkingLSATlaw schoollawtestexamadmissionslaw school admissionsstudyinglsat studyingstudying tipslogical reasoningtipslogic gamesreading comprehensionlsat podcastlaw school podcastpodcastThinking LSAT podcast7SageManhattan LSATpowerscoreblueprint lsatprinceton reviewfox lsatfoxlsatben olsonnathan foxben olsenstrategy prepstrategyprepstrategy prep lsatRCLRLGlsat study tipsLSAT demon