NO CAMERA HEARING AT 2PM TODAY 13THE SEPTEMBER 2023
FLYER
What would you do if it were you? I'd definitely want no cameras that's for sure.
You are in denial if you do not believe the power of influence that the main media possesses over your little grey cells. Organisations that are warranted the glorious first amendment to do as they please all in the name of freedom of speech. With freedoms of speech comes responsibilities, and for the press that duty lies in being neutral, unbiased and reporting the factual truth. Is Banfield doing that - clearly not. What has she become?
In any case in the land of America the Defendant's right to a fair trial out weigh anything, his 6th amendment will always trump the 1st. Your rules, so accept it.
The decision lies with the Judge - what will he decide? Maybe he can find a compromise. I don't know but he has to ensure the integrity of the court stands and delivers a fair trial to Bryan. He has to ensure that the jury is not influenced by the media, and social media for that matter.
This matter has been dragging on for months, the Defence have already seemingly complained about the conduct of the cameraman - filming Bryan's private parts - quite rightly - I hope the cameraman has been sacked for being so unprofessional and the news outlet sanctioned for disseminating the images. So if you want to point the finger of blame regarding no cameras in the courtroom point it directly at main media.
However, the irony of no cameras in the courtroom usually means no audio, and for that I am annoyed because unable to hear for myself or obtain a free transcript, I, like you, will be reliant upon reports from the very people who are creating a bias, who can not be trusted, who will cherry pick elements of the proceedings to create a bias. A pool of journalists will be allowed to sit in the courtroom and report upon the proceedings - there's no denying that as the courtroom is public.
What does the Motion by the Defence for no camera's actually achieve if the order is to granted? They are deliberately, and rightfully, raising the issue, not necessarily for the Judge to issue an order of no cameras but to have the issue and motion on record, so that in the event of an appeal later on after convictions, they have a clear and strong case.
The mere fact that members of the press pool will be able to report on the proceedings in any event, really makes no different if cameras are present or not, because this information will be peddled to all the media outlets unvetted and they will continue to present a twisted narrative - we will have been denied the privilege to hear, and see, the court proceedings for ourselves, and that makes us vulnerable to propaganda. For Bryan, in this proposed scenario it is highly likely that he will continue to be denied a fair trial, he can still raise the issue upon appeal at a later date. In fact, his argument may be stronger once the cameras are removed because only the press pool will be disseminating information and it will be much easier to prove the bias under current narrative of the media.
In essence the main media, due to their conduct, are ensuring that the verdict will be quashed at some point in the future. However, for that to happen Bryan has to prove a prejudice existed.
#coolherloocher #bryankohberger #idaho4 #maddiemogen #xanakernodle #love #kayleegoncalves #ethanchapin #bethanyfunke #dylanmortensen #moscowhomicides #truecrimecommunity #truth #shorts
#coolherloocher #bryankohberger #idaho4 #maddiemogen #xanakernodle #love #kayleegoncalves #ethanchapin #bethanyfunke #dylanmortensen #moscowhomicides #truecrimecommunity #truth #shorts
