In this video, I discuss the latest New England Journal of Medicine study on time-restricted feeding and some exceptionally bad takes on it. In particular, I detail how Andrew Huberman appears not to have read the study and mischaracterizes it on Twitter. Then, I talk about how Satchin Panda and Rhonda Patrick each mis-state important facts about and misinterpret the study’s significance. I use these examples as a sounding board to explain what we can in fact take away from the study—and indeed, from the research on time-restricted feeding to date.
UPDATE: I published a follow-up video here: [ Ссылка ]
===
Like, comment, subscribe.
For more, find me at:
PODCAST The Kevin Bass Show
YOUTUBE [ Ссылка ]
WEBSITE [ Ссылка ]
TWITTER [ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
INSTAGRAM [ Ссылка ]
TIKTOK [ Ссылка ]
And above all, please donate to support what I do:
PATREON [ Ссылка ]
DONATE [ Ссылка ]
