California has specific laws and regulations regarding firearm features, including pistol grips, that are designed to comply with the state's gun control laws. These compliant grips often have specific features that distinguish them from standard pistol grips and are designed to make it more difficult to use the firearm in a way that California considers problematic. Some common California compliant grip names and types include:
Thordsen FRS-15: The Thordsen FRS-15 is a fixed stock and grip system designed to comply with California regulations. It has a fin-like design to prevent a "pistol grip" configuration.
Featureless Grips: These are grips that lack specific features that would classify them as pistol grips under California law. They often have a more traditional and less ergonomic design.
Exile Machine Hammerhead: The Exile Machine Hammerhead is another featureless grip option that replaces the traditional pistol grip with a fin-like design.
Resurgent Arms Grip: This grip features a more vertical orientation, making it less ergonomic and similar to a traditional rifle grip.
Radlock Grip: The Radlock grip incorporates a paddle that needs to be activated to allow the magazine to be removed. This is designed to make it more difficult to detach a magazine without disassembling the action of the firearm.
Please note that California's firearm laws are subject to change, and compliance requirements may vary. It's crucial for firearm owners in California to stay informed about the latest regulations and consult with local authorities or legal experts to ensure compliance with current laws. Additionally, the specific features and names of compliant grips may evolve over time, so it's a good idea to check with local firearm dealers or manufacturers for the latest options and information.
California's Shocking Assault Rifle Laws Exposed
Теги
california assault weapon banglock assault rifle pistolcalifornia assault weapon ban updatecalifornia assault weapon ban update 2023california assault weapon ban overturnedhandgrip fin ARar15 binary triggerar handguard removalsupreme court firearms rulingrhode v. bontaduncan v. bontaarmed scholarjudge beniteznysrpa v. bruennysrpa oral argumentsassault weapons