What went wrong in Piers Morgan and Candace Owens’ interview? Why do they end up arguing? How does Candace deal with Piers’ questions, and are her answers reliable? This in-depth language analysis focuses on Candace’s arguments and persuasion techniques and the journalistic practices that she has a strong reaction to.

Support the work this channel is doing: [ Ссылка ]

This video has an educational purpose, and you can use the principles and concepts to decode your own conversations.

As an analysis, this video is made according to the terms of ‘fair use’.

In this part of the interview, Piers brings up Candace’s claim that France’s first lady, Brigitte Macron, isn’t who she says she is. How does Piers phrase the questions, and what do Candace’s responses reveal about the strength of her claims?

свернуть