Head to [ Ссылка ] to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code ACCORDINGTOALINA

YouTube has been taken over by "booktok bad" videos and after watching an inordinate amount of them, I got a sneaky feeling that although they are very good at explaining what Booktok is bad at, these videos might not be that "good" themselves.
Does Booktok have an overconsumption problem? Yes. Are reading aesthetics a bit cringe? Also yes.
And yes, the "spicy" book community can be a weird place at times. Certainly, one that comedian YouTubers can easily poke fun at.
But is that enough to throw around the "booktok is ruining literature" claim journalists and commentators love to clickbait with so much?

timestamps:

00:00 - I try to convince you I'm not a booktok apologist
01:19 - everyone's favourite scapegoat: the spicy book ladies
2:30 - "the problem with booktok is that it's performative"
5:21 - romance readers and being an intellectual online
9:12 - booktok is not just romance and spicy books FOR THE LOVE OF GOD
10:11 - the "tropeification" of literature
11:42 - the death of negative reviews
13:13 - caveat: some of the spicy book people are just unhinged
13:54 - the romance/ spicy book moral panic
19:45 - romance and erotica books have always been bestsellers
21:00 - critical thinking ≠ being a hater
23:30 - criticizing booktok gets views


the sources on this were all included on screen, sorry if I miss some of the links

videos mentioned:
Cyber Noop: [ Ссылка ]
Aydin Atush: [ Ссылка ]
RayLikeSunshine: [ Ссылка ]
Chad Chad: [ Ссылка ]
Alisha not Alihsha: [ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
Princess Weekes: [ Ссылка ]
Jack Edwards: [ Ссылка ]
Alice Cappelle: [ Ссылка ]
my previous video about romance books being "bad for women": [ Ссылка ]

the substack essay:
[ Ссылка ]

NYT article about Penguin Random House CEO:
[ Ссылка ]

#booktok

свернуть