TENET Ending Fan Theory: Is Neil Really Kat's Son ? | His True Origins Explained. We break down the TENET fan theory that says Robert Pattinson's character Neil might actually be Kat's son from the future. There are full spoilers here so if you don't want the ending of the movie ruined then don't watch this.

#TENET #RobertPattinson #FanTheory

TENET Time Inversion Explained + The Movie's Timeline - [ Ссылка ]

TENET Ending Explained Breakdown + How Time Inversion Works & Story | Full Movie Spoiler Review - [ Ссылка ]

If you enjoyed this video then please subscribe to the channel [ Ссылка ]

If You Want To Help Support The Channel So I Can Make More Videos Like This Please Donate Here:
[ Ссылка ]

Get some awesome Heavy Spoilers show clothes, phonecases and accessories at - [ Ссылка ]


/* ----- SOCIAL MEDIA ----- */

Follow Me On Social Media At:
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]


/* ----- DISCORD ----- */

Join our Discord Community at - [ Ссылка ]


/* ----- VIDEO INFORMATION ----- */

Tenet Neil Fan Theory

Ok so initially Neil just seems like a contact that was randomly assigned to The Protagonist to help him with his missions. However, the character starts to play his hand more and more throughout the movie and we realise that he knows far more than he should. He spouts off dialogue about how time inversion works, knows about the grandfather paradox and always seems to be one step ahead of the game.

In the end it's revealed that the character is actually himself fully briefed up on exactly what's going on and we learn that in the future he was hired by The Protagonist before being sent to protect his younger self.

It's a twist that fatefully leads to the characters death but what if it goes far beyond that?

Well firstly I just wanna shoutout WillJD11 who first dropped the theory on my Tenet ending explained video. It wasn't something that I caught first watch, however, having gone back to the film a second time, I think it becomes glaringly obvious that it's the case.

I pretty much sat throughout the film making notes on my phone which probably ruined the movie for people behind me but god dammit this is important work.

So the first time we meet Neil he spouts off two lines of dialogue that pretty much cement that he is examining what kind of person that The Protagonist is at this point.

When talking to him, Neil asks "would you take a child hostage?" before following this up with "what about a woman?"

It's something that flies by the first time, however on a second viewing it becomes clear that he is of course referring to Kat and her Son in order to see whether The Protagonist would be willing to protect them or if he would risk their lives.

Their lives are of course paramount to the storyline but that fact that he asks about the child first could be playing his hand. If Neil is really the child then he would of course have his own interests at heart and he must be sure that The Protagonist is going to do anything he can to protect him so that he can return the favour when he's older.

He also asks about Kat because if this theory is true and she is his mother then he would want to protect her. After Kat is shot at the half way point of the movie, Neil takes great care of her and pretty much nurses her back to health, almost going above and beyond what's expected for a field ops member.

Neil isn't a medic and the fact that he spends so much time with her when he could have easily just took a medic along with them does hint at what's going on.

► Artist Attribution
Music By: "KaizanBlu"
• Instagram - [ Ссылка ]
• SoundCloud - [ Ссылка ]
• Facebook - [ Ссылка ]
• TikTok - @kaizanblu [ Ссылка ]
• YouTube - [ Ссылка ]...
• DOWNLOAD @ [ Ссылка ]
Licence: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
- Full licence here: [ Ссылка ]...
• Music released by: Chill Out Records @ [ Ссылка ] & [ Ссылка ]

Instrumental by Homage
[ Ссылка ]

свернуть