0:00 - Intro

0:45 - Background

2:02 - Tutorial

3:36 - Examples

Sample Motion:

REQUEST FOR SUPERVISORY REVIEW

FACTS

On February of 2017, almost 5 years ago, Petitioner, filed an I 130 petition on
behalf of Beneficiary. See Exhibit A
Petitioner and beneficiary were interviewed on two occasions January 3rd and
March 27th 2018 respectively. They attended both interviews. See exhibit B
USCIS alleges a second interview was scheduled on or about October 27th 2021.
Neither Petitioner nor Beneficiary received the Notice. If such a notice was sent, it
would have been the third interview?

LAW

A Motion to Reopen and Reconsider is appropriate where there is a clear error by
the service. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5.
Petitioner and Beneficiary have been pursuing their case since 2017 and have
made appearances at USCIS on two occasions. The service is incorrect that they
did not attend their second interview. They did on March of 2017. Please reopen
this matter so that the case can be concluded.

CONCLUSION

Please reopen this matter so that the case can be concluded and approved.

Tune in to GrayLaw TV for GN--good news! GN is the latest breaking news on immigration law, policies and procedures. Real cases GrayLaw firm is working on in real-time are discussed. You get a sense of processing times and changes in immigration policies. Humberto and Courtney discuss complicated subject matter on U.S. Immigration law and break it down in very simple terms so that it is understandable. Here you will also find information about green card through marriage process, green card interview, filing for a green card through marriage, renewing your green card, O -1 visas, work visas, and investor visas.

The information provided on this channel is for general information purposes only. It should not be construed as a communication of legal advice or opinion, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship.

Subscribe here: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть