Has your team ever suffered from a lack of commitment?
[ Ссылка ]
If so, you have probably seen the effects in the form of higher turnover and lower productivity in the company.
Disengagement can result from not feeling motivated, ineffective management or misalignment within the organization.
So what can be done to keep employees engaged? Incentivize them effectively.
Incentives are ‘rewards’ that serve to give employees something to strive for and provide tangible recognition of their good work.
When offered an incentive, 85% of employees feel more motivated to do their best.
When choosing incentives for your team you have to make sure that they match the wishes of your staff and are in line with the values of your company.
Research from Cornell University has shown that rewards increase motivation by linking a task and a goal, so employees who are rewarded more frequently are more motivated to complete the associated tasks.
Organizations that use employee incentive programs record a 79% success rate in achieving the goals set when the reward was offered.
Let’s take a closer look at these rewards:
Incentivising employees effectively requires both social and monetary recognition.
Social recognition, in many respects, is even more important than financial recognition!
In fact, as Harvard Business School researcher Amy Whillans said, ‘money is important in people’s lives, but it is not the only thing that matters.
Social recognition is a low-cost way for all organization members to publicly express their gratitude for other team members.
A McKinsey survey found that companies can achieve a 55% improvement in engagement by offering social recognition.
------------------
I want to ask your opinion on this situation. There is a group of high school students, who is going from house to house to collect donation. The big group is split in three subgroups. The first group gets a ten percent incentive of all the money they collect, the second group gets a one percent incentive of all the money they collect, the third group gets no incentive. In your opinion which of the three groups collected more money?
As you think about your reply, let me briefly introduce myself. My name is Giuseppe Conti, I'm a business school professor and the founder of Conti Advanced Business Learning, a company that specializes in negotiation and influencing.
It is now the answer to the previous situation.
The group that collected more money is actually the group that received no incentive, because they developed unintrinsic motivation for doing the task. Large incentives are not always the solution. Let me give you a historical example. In the 19th century the French rulers of Vietnam established this law: “Everyone who was bringing a dead rat, received a financial incentive”. And as a result of this law, indeed you know, a number of rats were killed, but other people started to breed rats, in order to continue to get money over time.
So, the message is, that large incentives are likely to drive people to do the behavior, which is in their own best interest. So, be careful to pay by the hour, your architect, your lawyer, or your consultant.
Another message is around the form of incentive, and I'm gonna give you two situations again. Let's imagine that you met an attractive person, and in due time you tell to this person, “Listen, I like you very much, I would like to make love with you”. Second type of situation, you meet this attractive person and this time you tell to this person, “I like you very much, I wanna make love with you, and to sweeten the deal, I'm gonna give you 50 euros”. Well, as you can imagine, it's unlikely that your potential partner will prefer the second option. Maybe 50 euros of flowers are likely to be much more effective. So the message is, that social incentives, gifts, praise, certificates, awards, positive feedback, are likely to be more effective than monetary rewards, especially with friends.
For more insight on negotiation and influencing, check our website www.cabll.ch. Thank you!
------------
I am 𝐆𝐢𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐩𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢 and, since 2005, I have been teaching in the field of Negotiation & Influencing at all the Top European Business Schools (Oxford, Cambridge, London Business School, Imperial College, INSEAD, HEC Paris, ESADE, IESE, RSM, SDA Bocconi, IMD and University of St. Gallen).
Subscribe to the CABL fortnightly newsletter for all things negotiation and influencing: [ Ссылка ]
LinkedIn:
Giuseppe Conti: [ Ссылка ]...
Conti Advanced Business Learning: [ Ссылка ]
