U ovoj naučnoj emisiji govorimo o NEVJEROVATNIM činjenicama o EVOLUCIJI ČOVJEKA! Video preporučujemo pogotovo onima koji vjeruju i teoriju evolucije čovjeka. Doista nevjerovatno!
Facebook: [ Ссылка ]
PRETPLATITE SE NA OVAJ KANAL!
===================================================
We've got to have some ancestors. We'll pick those. Why? Because we know they have to be there, and these are the best candidates. That's by and large the way it has worked. I am not exaggerating.
Gareth Nelson Curator at the American Museum of Natural History
Johnson P.E., Darwin on Trial, InterVarsity Press: Downers Grove Ill., Second Edition, 1993, p.76]
Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved. Biologist Francis Crick
Crick, Francis What Mad Pursuit, Basic Books (1990), p.138
We are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a divine foot in the door. Biologist Richard Lewontin
Richard Lewontin, Billions and billions of demons (review of The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl Sagan, 1997), The New York Review, p. 31, 9 January 1997.
[Hominid] collection is so tantalizingly incomplete, and the specimens themselves often so fragmented and inconclusive, that more can be said about what is missing than about what is present. Hence the amazing quantity of literature on the subject. Very few fossils indeed afford just one, incontrovertible interpretation of their evolutionary significance. Most are capable of supporting several interpretations. Different authorities are free to stress different features with equal validity ... but ever since Darwin's work inspired the notion that fossils linking modern man and extinct ancestor would provide the most convincing proof of human evolution, preconceptions have led evidence by the nose in the study of fossil man. Research Fellow John Reader
"Whatever happened to Zinjanthropus?" New Scientist, 26 March 1981, p. 802
Fossil evidence of human evolutionary history is fragmentary and open to various interpretations. Fossil evidence of chimpanzee evolution is absent altogether. Biologist Henry Gee
Return to Gee, H., "Return to the planet of the apes," Nature, Vol 412:131-132 (July 12, 2001)
The study of the evolution of modern humans from hominid ancestors is very speculative. Much of our present understanding is based on very little evidence. Only a few thousand hominid fossils have been discovered and most of these are incomplete. Sometimes anatomically similar bones collected over a wide area are assumed to be from the same individual, but they may actually be from different individuals.
The following account of hominid evolution does not pretend to be complete or undisputed. It is merely an attempt to bring together some of the information on hominids that has gained general acceptance. Biologist Michael Kent
Advanced Biology by Michael Kent, Oxford University Press (2000), pages 458-459
Again, the press are talking about ‘the missing link’. Let’s get one thing clear. There is no missing link. Rather, there are an indefinite number of missing branches.
There may be, for all we know, millions of missing species. Philosopher of Science John Wilkins
[ Ссылка ]
Many lines of evidence indicate that Darwinius has nothing at all to do with human evolution. Anthropologist Chris Kirk
[ Ссылка ]
Much DNA in higher organisms is little better than junk," and "it would be folly in such cases to hunt obsessively for" its function. Biologist Francis Crick
Leslie Orgel and Francis Crick, "Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite," Nature, 284:604-706 (April 17, 1980).
A lot of DNA in there is not needed –It’s Junk, if it is intelligently designed, than God needs to go back to school. Philosopher Philip Kitcher
[ Ссылка ]
