Gazette Philogynes (+ ebook gratuit) : [ Ссылка ]
Pensez à me rajouter à vos contacts sinon j'atterrirai dans vos SPAMS. Ou alors glisser le mail dans l'onglet Principal.
Mon programme 30 jours/30 rencontres : [ Ссылка ]

Je suis psychologue diplômé depuis 2016. Pour des séances avec moi : [ Ссылка ]

DEROULER POUR CONSULTER MES SOURCES
........................................................
Pour rejoindre le club des Philogynes : [ Ссылка ]
Pour accéder à l'ebook étudiant : [ Ссылка ]
........................................................
Pour soutenir mon travail (Tipee) : [ Ссылка ]
Twitter : [ Ссылка ]
Instagram : [ Ссылка ]
Pour me contacter : contact@lesphilogynes.com

La bibliographie pour cette vidéo :

Betzig, L. (1997). People are animals. Human nature: A critical reader, 1-17.

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and brain sciences, 12(01), 1-14.

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological review, 100(2), 204.

Buss, D. M. (2016). The Evolution of Desire-Revised. Basic books.
Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1082-1093.

Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 125.

Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and sociobiology, 14(2), 89-96.

Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Sexual selection and physical attractiveness. Human Nature, 4(3), 205-235.

Greenlees, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 59-72.

Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1995). Men's and women's preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(6), 728-750.

Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173-178.

Li, N. P., Balley, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(6), 947-955.

Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2010). Kind toward whom? Mate preferences for personality traits are target specific. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 29-38.

Phillips, T., Barnard, C., Ferguson, E., & Reader, T. (2008). Do humans prefer altruistic mates? Testing a link between sexual selection and altruism towards non‐relatives. British Journal of Psychology, 99(4), 555-572.

Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266(1431), 1913-1917.

Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(6), 1074.

Symons, D. (1980). The evolution of human sexuality revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(02), 203-214.

Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., & Wasserman, T. H. (1995). Low-investment copulation: Sex differences in motivations and emotional reactions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(1), 25-51.

Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle. New York and Oxford: Oxford University
Press.


Narcisse moins séduisant que Crésus : [ Ссылка ]

свернуть