Alfred Ivey Jr. was found guilty of raping a minor and fathering a child through DNA evidence. Ivey appealed, claiming errors in the DNA expert's testimony and arguing that the statistical technique used was unreliable. He also claimed that he was entitled to a Daubert hearing, which was denied. However, the court found no errors and rejected Ivey's arguments, upholding his conviction.
Ivey v. Commonwealth (2016)
Supreme Court of Kentucky
486 S.W.3d 846
Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]
